There's talk about changing our name from "Ann Arbor" to "Washtenaw County" so as to include our friends in Ypsi, Pittsfield, Dexter, Saline, et al. Any objections?
@instance I support this. We should be inclusive - one of the things that grinds me about a certain segment of A2 residents is the idea that A2 is a walled garden, which of course is not true.
One issue is that anyone outside of SE Michigan has no idea what "Washtenaw County" is, so in the instance description we should say that it includes Ann Arbor, Ypsi, Dexter, Saline, etc.
@instance I don't know if the web server can support the load of all of Washtenaw County!
@instance No objections here!
But what about the southern half of Milan??
I mostly kid, but any placename is going to by nature exclude. To me, in ypsi, "a2" is arguably more appropriate as a regional identity definer than "washtenaw"
@dgoings is this good or
@dzombak well that gif totally failed. Thanks, Obamodon
Hello to you, too, fellow ypsi'an and Kimmy gif fan!
@instance Most of the other instances aren't geo-defined, and I think that the term isn't exclusive (but I'm an insider, so I might not recognize my privilege).
But I *REALLY* like having a short URL when I have to type it, especially on the phone.
@dzombak yeah. I've been following it. And I think you've done well with making it inclusive and understandable
@Cornellbox 👍🏻 thanks!
@instance I'd prefer keeping the URL as-is, but I'm indifferent as to the actual name
@kylelady I think people generally agreed that updating the site’s description to be more inclusive is a good-enough solution.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!